Showing posts with label Temporary Attorneys. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Temporary Attorneys. Show all posts

Sunday, June 23, 2013

Using Contract Attorneys for Document Reviews

Using Contract Attorneys for Document Reviews

There are numerous law firms and in-house legal departments using the services of contract attorneys for their document review work. The advantages of doing so are numerous. In the following lines, you will find out more about what the attributions of a contract attorney are and what you should expect when working with such a professional.

What do Contract Attorneys Do?

Some of the common tasks assigned to a contract attorney are:

  • conduct document review work
  • draft agreements, settlements, various contracts and other legal documents
  • perform the work of an associate that is out of the office
  • document review work with the use of specialized skills, such as knowledge in a foreign language or expertise in a particular field
  • legal research on particular legal issues that are of interest to the company hiring the attorney
  • offering support for teams when they prepare for litigation
  • preparing reports on an annual basis
  • providing assistance in migrating to upgraded software
  • reviewing employee manuals and making suggestions for improving them
  • engagement with the laws of another state
  • assisting in the discovery stage of a particular case
In short, the position of a contract attorney involves a wide range of tasks, and such professionals need to be properly prepared before starting. The nature of the tasks and attributions assigned to a contract attorney also vary according to the firm for which he or she works, which may be a small firm, a corporation, a company in collaboration with the government or an in-house counsel.

How Much do I Need to Pay for the Work of a Contract Attorney?

Most contract attorneys should be paid by the hour of document review work. However, there are some professionals who prefer to charge a flat rate. For the best results and to save costs, it is best that you discuss your case in advance and provide all the information such a professional needs to establish a quote. Set a rate up front, and you will avoid any unpleasant surprises.

Depending on the scope of the project and the complexity and the contract attorney's level of experience, hourly rates can range from $25 per hour to over $100 per hour. 

Rahul D. Yodh is a Principal of Link Legal Search Group, a boutique legal search & staffing firm that provides lateral attorney recruitment and contract attorney services to organizations nationwide. For more information on Link Legal Search Group, please visitwww.linklegalsearch.com

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Legal Departments & Law Firms Depending More on Temporary Attorneys

Gina Passarella recently wrote this in the GC Mid Atlantic:

In an era when cost predictability reigns supreme, corporate law departments are increasingly using project- or contract-based attorneys to help handle an increased workload on a shrunken budget.

And their business-minded approach has law firms thinking about doing the same thing.

James LaRosa, an owner of staffing firm JuriStaff in Philadelphia, said the use of skilled attorneys on a project basis is nothing new to law departments, but the number of departments looking at this option and the amount of projects available has definitely increased in the last year.

General counsel are donning their business hats and looking at how they can handle a growing workload in an more highly regulated environment without adding to their permanent headcount, he said. Bringing on specialized, experienced attorneys for six months to a year to handle one set project in their area of expertise has become the solution.

Project attorneys are a more viable answer to the budget problem in part because there are so many skilled lawyers out of work due to layoffs at AmLaw 200 firms and the consolidation of legal departments prior to the economic downturn, which led to cuts in those departments as well, LaRosa said.

"The pool of contract attorneys right now is exceptional," he said.

A typical candidate right now would have experience at either an AmLaw 200 firm or a specialized boutique, and oftentimes will have law department experience as well.

"What they are getting typically is an attorney with a lot more relevant experience and a lot more real life practice experience," LaRosa said.

Technology has also bolstered the trend. Legal departments in rural areas looking for a specialized attorney don't have to be limited to a regional search, where such expertise may not be readily available.

"So a legal department in Tennessee or Kentucky that needs a specific IP attorney and might not be able to find the best candidates within 50 miles of their office in their rural setting, if they are open to the contract model, they basically then have the whole country or the whole world, in essence, to find the perfect candidate," LaRosa said.

The average project for a contract attorney in this setting lasts about six months to a year and is more or less full time. LaRosa said some attorneys will work just 20 hours a week on a certain project, freeing them up to handle another matter somewhere else as long as conflicts aren't an issue.

He currently has a contract lawyer working at two different pharmaceutical companies. Each company had to know about the dual role and clear it.

Pharmaceutical companies are big users of this model because they have specialized practice areas within their groups and may need to fill gaps in shrinking departments with attorneys who have experience in those areas, he said. In terms of practice areas where project attorneys are most often used, it depends on the department.

LaRosa said there is often a lot of activity on the corporate contract side, as well as labor and employment and intellectual property, both in terms of prosecution and litigation.

Law departments tend to look for temporary help on litigation matters when it comes to document review and e-discovery needs, but LaRosa said they are opening up to bringing on more skilled project attorneys to handle research and writing on the litigation side.

Valerie Esposito of McAnney Esposito & Kraybill Associates in Pittsburgh said she has seen a "huge upswing" in the contract attorney market because of the recession. She said she was surprised to see the bulk of the hires in that area were on the corporate side, which was hardest hit in terms of permanent placements.

Esposito said, however, that as the economy starts to stabilize, she is starting to see the permanent hiring rebound.

"As confidence has grown and the financial outlook has remained stable, I think they are leaning back toward permanent hires rather than contract hires," she said of law department hiring trends.

LaRosa said there was a high propensity for these positions to turn into full-time gigs in better economic conditions. He said it remains to be seen whether budgets will allow for that trend to continue in the current economy.

As law departments start to look at full-time hires, contract attorneys have filled, and continue to fill, an important role in a tough economy. There is always work to be done in a recession, but there is a fear of permanent hiring, Esposito said. Project lawyers were a partial solution to those concerns.

And the positives seem to outweigh the negatives.

Law departments get the benefit of hiring specialized attorneys at a price LaRosa said is almost always lower than what outside counsel would charge. He said the average rate for project attorneys is between $75 and $150 an hour, with perhaps a higher hourly rate for more specialized attorneys. The downside, he said, is that they may leave before the project concludes. But that can happen with any attorney at a law firm, and the ability to find a replacement project attorneys is generally easy in this market, he said.

A TWIST ON THE MODEL

Steve Feder, co-founder of start-up GenCounsel, said he too has noticed a growing need from general counsel who feel they are "boxed in" between increasing workloads, hiring freezes and budget crunches that prevent significant use of outside counsel.

Feder said he found it to be a "disturbing trend," however, that contract attorneys are being brought into law departments on week-to-week engagements and are being paid "embarrassing" rates for their experience level. Feder said GenCounsel is selling its services in a different way, but essentially selling into the same marketplace.

The company provides what he hesitantly calls part-time general counsel. The primary focus initially was on small companies with no in-house lawyers who needed temporary help at an experienced level -- all of GenCounsel's 11 attorneys are either, or both, former senior level law firm partners or former general counsel of large companies.

Interest has expanded to include small companies who already have an in-house team but need help in clearing a backlog or working on a specific project. The GenCounsel attorney comes in for a three-month period to start and then can continue on month by month. Feder said no one has stopped after three months yet, but the general counsel also know this isn't a rent-to-own situation and there is no pressure to keep the attorneys on board.

GenCounsel's lawyers typically help with commercial work related to vendor contracts, a large client contract or even acquisitions; human resources work related to consolidating employee handbooks after an acquisition, general HR support and building infrastructure in that area; and overall strategy through sitting in on management meetings or advising whether to do a deal.

One general counsel recently told Feder about a secondment experience in which the GC asked the outside firm to send someone over to fill the role of the associate general counsel who was on maternity leave. The attorney would have to handle HR matters, new product development initiatives and customer contracts. The law firm sent over a third-year litigation associate. The GC sent her back to the firm within a month. Feder said that is exactly the type of problem his company was designed to solve.

GenCounsel attorneys sometimes come in one day a week to help with backlog or come in full time to help on an acquisition. Feder said they don't bill by the hour but instead charge a fixed fee or monthly retainer that is significantly lower than a large law firm would charge but higher than a staffing agency might charge.

About a third of GenCounsel's referrals through April of this year came from large law firms, who Feder said realize his company isn't competition but an added tool. He said he works closely with outside firms when a matter requires it and often they appreciate having an attorney inside the client who can be their contact person.

If his company can handle a matter on its own, it will, and if a matter requires additional help, Feder said he will bring on board a law firm to assist. He said he'd like to think he is particularly good at buying outside counsel services given his own prior experience as a general counsel at Safeguard Scientifics.

LAW FIRMS JOINING THE PARTY?

As law firms see their clients turn to contract attorneys, the firms are too. LaRosa said he is seeing more law firms hiring project-based lawyers in an effort to show their clients that "they get it."

LaRosa said he has one client right now who has left a large AmLaw firm to start his own practice staffed only with contract lawyers.

"He will use that as an advantage to potential clients by explaining and showing that he's not taking on the overhead of the traditional associate and the space that is required for them," LaRosa said. "He will have at the ready quality lawyers with the specific practice areas required to be used on project basis."

The client then gets the benefit of having a former AmLaw partner manage their projects while they are handled by experienced attorneys who are charged out at a lower rate than large firm associates, he said.

"It's in essence doing what some corporate legal departments are doing, but I think we will see more firms doing this," LaRosa said. 

Rahul D. Yodh is a Principal of Link Legal Search Group, a boutique legal search & staffing firm that provides lateral attorney recruitment and contract attorney services to organizations nationwide. For more information on Link Legal Search Group, please visitwww.linklegalsearch.com


Friday, April 12, 2013

Temporary Attorneys Can Help Firms Handle Big Cases. But What To Tell—And Bill—Clients?

Last year, a 125-lawyer Dallas-based firm was faced with the daunting task of reviewing the medical records of more than 100,000 claimants who had just reached settlements with the firm’s biggest client.

Instantly, the firm managers knew they needed help. Unless they pulled associates off other cases, they were not going to be able to get the records reviewed in time. On the other hand, they recognized that if they hired additional attorneys and support staff, they would not be able to retain them after the project was completed. The project itself was not complicated, just very time consuming; the records had to be reviewed in order to complete a corresponding checklist.

Their answer: temporary help. The firm’s management organized teams primarily made up of contract or project attorneys, paralegals, and clerks. Partners and associates, who had worked on the cases and were familiar with them, led each team.

The plan was a success. The medical records were reviewed well before the deadline, and in the process, the firm added to its bottom line.

By bringing on additional billable staff, the firm was able to expand its revenue-generating capacity. They could bill the time generated by the project attorneys and staff, with a very manageable overhead expense. At the same time, the firm was charged only a fraction of this rate for the hours each project professional worked and did not have the traditional burden (payroll taxes and benefits) that comes with a full-time employee.

This is just one example of how, as the economic outlook brightens,law firms are drastically changing their approach to staffing.

Almost three years ago, when the U.S. economy first showed signs of slipping into a recession, firms were structured in ways that did not allow them to respond effectively to the changing economy. To put it simply, firms were obese, having gorged themselves during the booming economy. One lesson learned is the importance for law firms to build a nimble staffing program that maximizes resources in an economically responsible way.

One option gaining popularity among law firms is organizing staff into specialized teams consisting of experienced, proficient, full-time, and temporary legal professionals. These teams are uniquely configured to meet the needs of a specific case or project or for a component of a case, such as discovery. Project based teams offer several advantages:

• Efficient use of resources. Many projects can be handled by bringing in specialized temporary legal professionals with appropriate skill sets and levels of experience, who are then supervised by in-house staff. This allows the firm to integrate a major project into its caseload without overtaxing resources or failing to properly service other clients.

• Strategic composition. Supervising attorneys or team leaders can handpick professionals from internal firm staff—and from outside the firm—with the specific experience and skills they need. Once a project is under way, the team can be adjusted as needed by adding or removing people from the team. This allows the firm to easily adapt to the many curveballs encountered during a lengthy case.

• Economical. Select professionals can be brought in as needed to fill specific roles on a project-based team. Their time can be limited to those parts of a case requiring their skill and expertise. This approach to staffing can lead to significant savings on overhead costs, especially in large or lengthy cases.

• Flexibility. By including temporary employees on the team, a smaller firm can take on a major litigation case it might otherwise have to forgo.

MORE CHOICES

Project-based staffing is not a new concept—law firms learned long ago that teams of legal professionals working together on the same case or project could help achieve greater productivity from available resources.

The fundamental difference today is that the teams are composed of a wider array of professionals and offer more flexibility.

Outside specialists and professionals may come from litigation support organizations, other law firms serving as co-counsel, and specialized legal staffing firms. A project-based team will usually include a balanced combination of attorneys, paralegals, secretaries, clerks, coders, and other full-time and temporary professionals.

There are certain types of cases that can benefit from the use of project-based staffing, including:

• Large/lengthy multistate, multiparty litigation. As a case grows in size, the costs associated with it grow not proportionally but exponentially. Project teams composed of in-house personnel and supplemented with outside specialists as needed (as opposed to hiring large numbers of new full-time staff) can help regulate costs.

• Document-intensive cases. Even in smaller cases, the volume of paperwork and documents has exploded in recent years. All this paper must be reviewed, sorted, and coded, so that a critical document or e-mail is not overlooked.

Rather than redirect internal staff from other cases, securing a number of project professionals to supplement a team of fulltime employees can be a highly effective approach. Firms can also turn to outside litigation support companies that possess the latest and greatest technology to handle parts of this document organization.

Other projects that can benefit from the use of temporary lawyers include large transactions, contract reviews, bankruptcies, and corporate governance.

INEVITABLE QUESTIONS

The use of this staffing strategy leads you to ask some inevitable questions, especially when it comes to project attorneys. How do you explain their use to your client? After all, if they are so highly qualified, why don’t they have full-time jobs?

You must explain to your client that this is an outdated opinion. Many project attorneys today have the qualifications to work in any large firm, but have chosen temporary work for lifestyle reasons.

Some are not the primary earners in their family and prefer the flexibility; others may have just relocated to the area and are using project-based work to break into the local market. Additionally, you can remind your client these attorneys will be supervised by team leaders from the firm familiar with their case. 

The American Bar Association recommends advising the client and obtaining client consent whenever a project attorney is performing independent work for a client without the close supervision of an attorney associated with the law firm.

However, where the project attorney is working under the direct supervision of a lawyer associated with the firm, disclosure is not ordinarily required.

What would be a reasonable rate to bill a client for work performed by a project attorney? To date, no ABA, state, or local bar opinion has directly addressed project attorney billing rates. Depending on the project attorney’s background and level of experience, he or she could be billed out at rates comparable to that of an associate.

A good rule of thumb is that you can bill a project lawyer out for up to three times the rate you are paying. Specialized legal staffing firms usually charge firms a specific rate for each attorney, taking into account the lawyer’s level of experience compared with your needs.

What about conflicts of interest? If these project attorneys are mercenaries working for every firm in town, how can a firm assure itself that there is no real or potential conflict of interest?

Conflict-of-interest issues must be resolved before the project attorney relationship begins. Both the hiring firm and the project attorney must determine whether there are any conflicts.

Hiring firms should maintain complete records showing the clients and matters worked on by each project attorney. The project attorney also needs to maintain a complete record of all cases handled and law firms served throughout his or her career.

The use of project-based staffing is an advanced and proven strategy to maximize personnel resources, allowing savvy law firms access to premier talent efficiently and economically.
Rahul D. Yodh is a Principal of Link Legal Search Group, a boutique legal search & staffing firm that provides lateral attorney recruitment and contract attorney services to organizations nationwide. For more information on Link Legal Search Group, please visit www.linklegalsearch.com 

Monday, January 28, 2013

Temporary Attorneys Are More Profitable


Following in the footsteps of many large, East Coast based law firms, Southern California firms are relying more and more on temporary attorneys for help with the rising amount of discovery documents, and particularly electronic discovery. Since 1999, 90 percent of all documents produced are electronic correspondence and data. This has certainly created a market for an unusual, and highly profitable, utilization of legal talent.

The vast majority of firms increasing their use of contract attorneys in the last three years contribute it to the burden of document discovery. Many firms, however, view document review as a profit center. Contract Attorney rates are at a fraction of the cost to pay their internal staff. Firms engage staffing agencies to find experienced, qualified document reviewers and handle all administrative tasks related to scheduling and payment of the contractors. Some staffing firms, such as Davidson Attorneys, also offer clients space and laptops for the project, and provide project management to prevent the firm's associates from being inundated by questions. This frees up their associates to perform more substantive work.

Discovery costs in litigation can be extremely expensive and often frustrate a firm's efforts. Cost sensitive clients are often advised to settle, even when they have a good case. Some firms find it extremely beneficial to pass through the cost savings of using contract attorneys to their client to encourage the client to move forward to trial.

In recent years, and with growing frequency, corporate clients are requesting their legal counsel hire contract attorneys to assist with document intensive matters, including mergers and acquisitions and to keep litigation costs down. Some corporate clients with in-house legal departments are even taking it upon themselves to take bids from and engage staffing firms.

Perhaps the greatest benefit of using contract attorneys is not having to be stuck with the extra labor and paying wages when the work ends, and it can end suddenly. Some may wonder why attorneys would choose to do this type of work, especially with its instability. A common misconception is that the only attorneys who would do document review are those who cannot find other employment. In fact, reasons for seeking document review work vary greatly, and currently there are as many as 5,000 attorneys in Washington D.C. working full time as document reviewers.

Many document review attorneys are graduates of top-tier law school schools, trying to figure out which direction to take. Some attorneys are transitioning between jobs, others looking for supplemental work to their own law practice, and some desiring the flexibility to travel or pursue non-legal ventures. Attorneys licensed in other states that have relocated to California typically seek document review work while they prepare for our notorious Bar exam, and some reviewers are seasoned attorneys that leave jobs at large firms for medical reasons or to raise families. There is a great deal of legal talent out there and available to assist firms when they need it.

Rahul D. Yodh is a Principal of Link Legal Search Group, a boutique legal search & staffing firm that provides lateral attorney recruitment and contract attorney services to organizations nationwide. For more information on Link Legal Search Group, please visitwww.linklegalsearch.com

Monday, January 14, 2013

You Need To Hire Temporary Attorneys... Now What?


Your case has entered the discovery phase and you are faced with the daunting task of reviewing millions of pages with a tight deadline for production to your adversary. Your firm does not have the resources to get through all of these materials in a timely manner. What are you going to do?

Whether you use a temporary attorney staffing agency to provide a pool of contract attorneys or hire directly, the same tips for hiring will apply. With a soft legal job market, there are plenty of bright, ambitious attorneys who will want to work on your project. The trick is learning how to select them.

For many attorneys, contract work provides a flexible work environment so that they can pursue other interests between jobs or in the evenings (e.g., writers, actors, entrepreneurs). Others may be trying to launch a solo practice, or may be new parents who don't want the big-firm grind. Some may have felt the sting of discrimination, and seek a way to enter the legal workplace.

Still others may have recently relocated or may not be admitted to practice in the state. Others simply may prefer a job that pays well that they don't have to take home with them at night.

RESUMES

Understanding these motivations can help you evaluate candidates. And their resumes can provide vital clues to help you select a successful review team.

First, fight the urge to favor pedigree as an indicator of quality. While you want bright people, it also takes a certain temperament and work ethic to competently review and analyze documents 10 hours a day.

Positive signs to look for in a resume include:

  • Working for the same law firm(s) on multiple occasions.
  • Repeated placement by the same agency or agencies.
  • Second review, quality control and privilege review experience.
  • Experience with multiple online review platforms.
  • Placement on both short-term and long-term assignments.
Red flags include:

  • Lack of second review, quality control or privilege review experience for experienced reviewers.
  • Large, unexplained gaps in the resume.
  • Candidates who lump all of their reviews under one heading so that you cannot ascertain how long they were on a project and/or the type and level of work performed.
  • Listing "solo practitioner" as their current job description. Be wary of hiring solo practitioners if their practice requirements could lead to frequent absenteeism (e.g., due to court appearances, real estate closings). They might be great for a night shift, but unreliable in a 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. slot.
THE INTERVIEW

Don't hire without an in-person interview. Some candidates look great on paper, but you will be only able to tell if they are an appropriate candidate if you meet them in person.

Brief 15-minute interviews of candidates will not only help you screen, but can help set a tone that communicates that you are invested in the reviewers as contributing members of your legal team.

Some interview tips:

  • Candidates should arrive on time, be professionally dressed and properly groomed.
  • Be cautious of candidates who cannot cogently discuss any of the reviews on which they have worked.
  • If you use a staffing agency, insist that the agency rank the candidates it submits to you.

    This will force the staffing manager to truly reflect on the candidates who will best fit your firm's personality and will help you prioritize interviews.
EXPECT QUESTIONS
You should expect to be asked the following questions:

  • What is the approximate duration of project?
  • Does it pay a flat rate or does it pay overtime?
  • Is there an opportunity for weekend work, and, if so, is it required?
  • Are there any caps or minimum hours required?
  • Is there flexibility to work from home?
  • Is there an opportunity for a raise or completion bonus for long-term projects?
OFFERS

You should make your offers quickly and try to avoid startup delays to avoid losing the best candidates to other projects.

Always pay attorneys who are performing the same task at the same rate. Managers may make slightly more, but make sure their role includes tasks other than strictly document review.

REVIEW SITES

Staffing agencies will typically offer you "free" space for a large review.

However, while the agencies don't charge you directly for the room, they typically will bill you an additional $3 to $5 per hour, per attorney.

However, this may be well worth considering if your firm is small, or has no extra space -- because it will relieve you of the burden and costs of finding and maintaining space.

ENVIRONMENT
Be sure that your firm provides a pleasant and productive work environment:

  • Cramped rooms or basement spaces are notorious in the industry and obviously disfavored.
  • Provide desks or open tables in one large room to facilitate interaction between contract attorneys and supervisors. This will lead to a more consistent review.
  • Bathrooms should be cleaned frequently and well-stocked.
  • A break-out room where attorneys can take a call is also helpful.
  • There should be plenty of coffee and beverages available for reviewers.
  • Make sure that your site has offices for the site supervisor and associates.
  • Be sure your site has as a high-speed printer, photocopier and office supplies.
TRAINING

It is very important to take the necessary time to present your attorneys with an overview of the case -- and follow that up with weekly meetings to respond to their questions and to provide feedback.

Do not undervalue the intelligence of your attorneys. Their understanding of the bigger picture enables them to think about the documents instead of mindlessly coding and makes them feel part of a team. The rewards are innumerable.

Imagine a partner asking you to write a memo, but refusing to tell you what the case is about or what you are trying to achieve.

LESSONS LEARNED

Using contract attorneys can be an effective way to tackle a large-scale review.

You will find that your best contract attorneys will respect you and will want to work with you on future matters, and will tell their colleagues who are looking for work.

And referrals from quality workers are almost always your best hiring bet! 

Rahul D. Yodh is a Principal of Link Legal Search Group, a boutique legal search & staffing firm that provides lateral attorney recruitment and contract attorney services to organizations nationwide. For more information on Link Legal Search Group, please visitwww.linklegalsearch.com

Friday, November 30, 2012

How To Hire A Temporary Attorney


Law.com had a great article on how to hire temporary attorneys. You can find the full article here


Sometimes, a business -- e-commerce enterprises among them -- just doesn't have the people power to meet some demands that may come up unexpectedly or that were anticipated from the start. This situation can arise for a number of reasons, from increased business to expansion to mergers.

When the demand for more minds and hands develops, using contract staff provides businesses with a flexible staffing alternative. Contractors allow for a temporary, and sometimes indefinite, expansion of the workforce for a particular project. Occasionally, contractors join the staff as permanent employees -- whether to sustain new business demands, to replace staff lost by attrition or otherwise or to fulfill new duties brought on by additional business.

Law firms use Temporary Attorneys to aid in large-scale document reviews such as those often required in e-discovery as well as for mergers, internal audits and other matters that require an influx of temporary help.

Of course, the subject matter involved in these wide-ranging projects varies, which makes contractors an ideal solution for dynamic business. If a project requires that attorneys or other workers who are or may be involved have a specific background, then law firms, or the agencies they hire, may well be better positioned using temporary workers who also may be making a specialty of the work required. And often, projects require only a general legal background, which makes finding candidates far easier. 

But whatever the situation that demands looking for short-term or long-term employees -- for staff positions or contract work -- firms should consider the key factors when hiring temporary attorneys.

WHAT TO CONSIDER IN THE BEGINNING

The old adage "The best defense is a good offense," invariably proves true in so many situations that it's not surprising that it applies to the business process of hiring contract workers -- regardless of whether those workers are attorneys, other office staff or even managers.

So, assessing key factors from the beginning allows the hiring personnel to exert effective project management from the start. A point to ponder is that although this approach is often discussed, it's frequently sidestepped or given short shrift in the ever-pressured office suites and conference rooms of the commercial and professional sectors, but don't give in, because slowing down, buckling down and paying attention from the start is the best way to guard against catastrophe at or near the end.

QUESTIONS TO ASK

The essential questions that must be asked are determined by:

·         the kind of work that is involved;

·         the structure of the firm that is or will be hiring the contractors, and

·         the applicable jurisdictional rules that will apply to the work.

Specifically, the most basic questions involve timing and location. For instance:

· How much work does the firm need to accomplish?

· What's the deadline by which the work must be completed?

· A bottom-line logistical consideration: Where should the project take place?

The answers to these questions determine how many contractors the firm needs to hire for the project and will help hiring personnel determine the most accurate figure for the projected number of hours that will be needed to finish the work. And because deadlines often must be bent to accommodate unpredictable variables or work must be accelerated to meet a deadline that can't be bent, firms should consider overtime as well.

SPACE CONSIDERATIONS

Of course, a consideration to throw into the equation here is that paying overtime requires fewer contractors, but can lead to a significant cost increase.

Space also influences these decisions. For example, does the firm have adequate space at its headquarters or other location, or should the project take place off-site, and if so, where? If the project must be done partly or entirely off-site, will the law firm or firm hiring the contract attorneys use its own facilities, a client's -- such as the client or clients involved in the work being done -- or will space have to be leased or rented? How much will that cost, and how will those costs affect the project?

This article addresses basic hiring steps and so won't go into details of logistics concerns, but they are important factors that must be addressed.

SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE

After weighing these considerations, principals involved in the work must weigh the type of project being tackled, which will guide them to the next step: Does the project involve an impending merger, document-intensive litigation or some kind of specialized filing? The answers to these questions dictate deciding whether contract candidates need specialized experience. If they do, then the specific qualifications the candidates should possess must be sorted out and clearly defined. For example, if a firm needs contractors to review documents for a telecommunications merger, do qualified candidates need a familiarity with the relevant antitrust statutes, or will a general legal background suffice? Hirers must also consider whether the candidates need prior document-review experience, because sometimes, prior experience can speed the completion of the project, but at other times, seasoned reviewers' broad experience may present a conflict for them working on a specific case, and they must be excluded from consideration.

THE LAY OF THE LAND

The type of project to be done also raises jurisdictional concerns. Jurisdiction, for example, determines what code of ethics applies to the case or project. Rules vary by jurisdiction, so where the project takes place matters a great deal.

Consider: The District of Columbia Court of Appeals held that attorneys doing contract work within the jurisdiction need to be admitted to the D.C. Bar. This holding required temporary attorneys to waive into the D.C. Bar within 90 days of practicing in the District. This holding characterizes practicing law to include document review, so temporary Attorneys hired to do document review for a firm in the Washington metropolitan area must waive into the D.C. Bar. Determining the applicable jurisdictional rules will guide a firm's search for candidates because the rules dictate the appropriate bar status required of any attorney hired for the project who might handle applicable duties. But keep in mind that bar status doesn't always affect the project. Sometimes, for instance, nonbarred attorneys or attorneys barred anywhere are sufficient to do the work, though knowing up-front the jurisdictional rules will prevent problems during the project, and preventing them, it should go without saying, usually means smoother sailing than having to meet them -- and, sometimes, determine them -- once work has begun.

WHERE TO LOOK

After deciding on the basics as outlined above, recruiters will be confronted with the quite-relevant question of how to find the temporary Attorneys needed. Two options exist: 

1. Hiring contractors independently; or

2. Using a staffing agency.
Remember, too, that the type of project and the amount of direct contact with the contractors influence the decision of how to hire the contract lawyers.

The benefits of using a staffing agency are discussed below.

As with any work, the type of project also influences the type of technological support that will be required. Making sure that the firm's network can sustain the amount of use necessary will prevent crashes that can slow the project. Security is also an important concern. Providing Internet access poses a risk to the network, for instance. As for other technology concerns, if the project requires litigation support, popular document-review programs include Summation, Concordance, DT Search Desktop and Introspect.

Another security concern: What level of access will contract workers have to firm data or to data involved in the project? Also, will contract workers have total or some type of specific limited access to the facility or multiple sites where the project is being done? And during what times will that access be permitted?

Helping to ensure security will likely involve working with IT personnel so that the appropriate levels of access and security can be put in place and monitored, and then parameters changed, if necessary, after the project is completed. Also, what if some or all of the contractors must return to the office or to a site to continue or begin another phase of the project that was anticipated for another date, or to begin a part of the project that hadn't been anticipated because it couldn't have been?

Answers to questions above that any particular project may demand be asked will guide the search for creating the contract-staffing situation best tailored to the needs of the firm and the project at issue. Remember that old adage as it echoes through the halls of your firm as you plan any project: Accurately assessing the situation from the beginning will aid in creating cost-effective staffing solutions for the entire project.

BENEFITS OF USING A STAFFING AGENCY 

Instead of investing your firm's time and energy conducting a candidate search, using a staffing agency allows experts to look for the qualifications that a particular business endeavor requires. A staffing agency provides a built-in screening process and should ensure that each candidate has the minimum qualifications. Staffing agencies work from an existing pool of candidates, but also have the capability to recruit specialized candidates using various search engines and other recruitment tools. Additionally, staffing agencies provide the benefit of managing the temporary Attorneys while they are on the project, which entails taking care of payroll and scheduling -- a major break for the hiring firm.

Making a decision about which agency to use requires some investigation. Legal recruiting is a specialized field, but each agency can offer slightly different services. Some agencies screen candidates better than others do, which means that they are doing more to verify the credibility of their candidates. Some agencies, for instance, do reference and background checks and verify every candidate's degree and bar status. But some agencies check only an applicant's references.

It's also important to confirm that the staffing agency meets and interviews each candidate who is registered with the agency. Similarly, recruiters at some firms choose to meet with the potential contract employees and conduct another interview. The staffing agency can coordinate this process and ensure that all of the necessary information about each candidate is provided.

Some agencies can also offer litigation support in-house, which is an important amenity if space is an issue. In this sort of situation, the staffing agency will provide the work space for the project, the technical support and the temporary Attorneys. This setup is ideal for firms for which space and extra support staff are in short supply. It allows firms to grow their business without having to grow their physical location. If the placement agency provides space, then the fees increase to cover overhead, but this arrangement provides a low-maintenance way to conduct additional business and requires the client to do little or no legwork.

Another crucial factor to consider is pricing. Pricing often determines the feasibility of the business venture from the beginning. Determining the hourly market price for temporary Attorneys, then, is critical. The most efficient way to do this is to compare the bill rates of several placement firms. For instance, in the Washington, D.C., market the pay rate for D.C. barred or bar-pending temporary Attorneys varies. The bill rate then varies by agency. Paying overtime varies, too. Typically, temporary Attorneys are compensated at the set hourly rate for the first 40 hours they work each week. Any additional hours are billed as overtime.

Factors that increase an hourly rate per attorney include bar status and the number of years of the attorneys' experience. As one might guess, hiring barred attorneys is typically more expensive than hiring nonbarred attorneys. There's also an increased hourly rate when hiring a contractor with years of substantive experience. Similarly, the specified field -- antitrust or family law, for instance -- affects the bill rate. An inside track to hiring contractors is that it also provides a way for firms to test candidates who may later end up as permanent employees.

Working with a staffing agency also presents an opportunity to develop a business relationship. When deciding which staffing firm to work with, clients should consider the reputation of the firm in the legal community and the level of customer service provided to clientele.

Often, projects requiring contract staff develop suddenly -- projects that a firm hadn't considered would fall into their laps and they must ramp up quickly to handle them. Working with a staffing agency whose personnel understand the urgency of a client's business needs leads to better customer service all around. Agencies that put this business principle into practice can provide firms with qualified candidates in a timely fashion -- and that's one of the first measures of that ounce-of-prevention rule.

Rahul D. Yodh is a Principal of Link Legal Search Group, a boutique legal search & staffing firm that provides lateral attorney recruitment and contract attorney services to organizations nationwide. For more information on Link Legal Search Group, please visit www.linklegalsearch.com